Comparison

Poulpes à l’ail et au persil vs Sałatka z kukurydzą

Overall, Sałatka z kukurydzą has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPoulpes à l’ail et au persilSałatka z kukurydzą
Nutri-Score d a
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 200 kcal 32 kcal
Fat 13 g 0.3 g
Saturated fat 1.3 g 0 g
Sugars 0.5 g 2.6 g
Salt 1.8 g 0.9 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 21 g 1.3 g
Additives00
AllergensMolluscsCelery

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sałatka z kukurydzą has 84% fewer calories (32 kcal vs 200 kcal).
  • Sałatka z kukurydzą has 98% less fat (0.3 g vs 13 g).
  • Sałatka z kukurydzą has 97% less saturated fat (0 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Poulpes à l’ail et au persil has 81% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2.6 g).
  • Sałatka z kukurydzą has 50% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Poulpes à l’ail et au persil has 94% more protein (21 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Sałatka z kukurydzą has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Poulpes à l’ail et au persil lists: Molluscs.
  • Only Sałatka z kukurydzą lists: Celery.

Ingredients

Poulpes à l’ail et au persil

Poulpes (Octopus cyaneus) 87%, huiles infusées (huile de colza, huile d'olive vierge extra, ail, échalotes et herbes de Provence), ail 2,8%, persil 2,1%, sel, jus concentré de citron, vinaigre.

Sałatka z kukurydzą

Warzywa 63,6 % (marchew, ogórki kiszone, ziemniaki, pietruszka, _seler_, groszek zielony), woda, kukurydza 5,4 %, sól, cukier.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Poulpes à l’ail et au persil or Sałatka z kukurydzą?

Overall, Sałatka z kukurydzą has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sałatka z kukurydzą has fewer calories: 32 kcal versus 200 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Poulpes à l’ail et au persil has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons