Polpo cotto al naturale vs Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale
Overall, Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Polpo cotto al naturale
Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Polpo cotto al naturale | Tentacoli di polpo cotto al... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 77 kcal | 87 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Molluscs | Molluscs |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Polpo cotto al naturale has 11% fewer calories (77 kcal vs 87 kcal).
- Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale has 47% less fat (0.8 g vs 1.5 g).
- Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale has 25% more protein (20 g vs 15 g).
Ingredients
Polpo cotto al naturale
Polpo (molluschi) (Octopus cyanea), sale, acqua
Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale
Polpo (Octopus vulgaris-mollusco), sale, alloro
FAQ
Which is healthier: Polpo cotto al naturale or Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale?
Overall, Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Polpo cotto al naturale has fewer calories: 77 kcal versus 87 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Polpo cotto al naturale has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.