Comparison

Plain Mountain Trout vs Regenbogen-Forellenfilets

Overall, Plain Mountain Trout has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPlain Mountain TroutRegenbogen-Forellenfilets
Nutri-Score a d
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 111 kcal 139 kcal
Fat 3.4 g 6.4 g
Saturated fat 0.7 g 1.6 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.8 g 2.3 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 20 g 20 g
Additives00
AllergensFishFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Plain Mountain Trout has 20% fewer calories (111 kcal vs 139 kcal).
  • Plain Mountain Trout has 47% less fat (3.4 g vs 6.4 g).
  • Plain Mountain Trout has 56% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Plain Mountain Trout has 63% less salt (0.8 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Plain Mountain Trout has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Plain Mountain Trout

Rainbow trout*(Oncorhynchus mykiss)99%,salt 1%. *Ingredients from Organic Farming.

Regenbogen-Forellenfilets

Forellenfilet (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Aquakultur gewonnen in Dänemar Kochsalz. Heissgeräuchert (durchgegart). Ingrédients : filet de truite (Oncorhynchus mykiss) poisson élevé au Danemark, sel de cuisine. Fumés à chaud (cults). Ingredienti: filetto di trota (Oncorhynchus mykiss) allevata in Danimarca, sale da cucina. Affumicata a caldo (colti).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Plain Mountain Trout or Regenbogen-Forellenfilets?

Overall, Plain Mountain Trout has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Plain Mountain Trout has fewer calories: 111 kcal versus 139 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Plain Mountain Trout has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons