Pipas Gigantes con Sal vs Pipas fritas peladas
Overall, Pipas fritas peladas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pipas Gigantes con Sal | Pipas fritas peladas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 612 kcal | 646 kcal |
| Fat | 50.1 g | 56.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.2 g | 5.4 g |
| Sugars | 3.5 g | 3.1 g |
| Salt | 11 g | 1.4 g |
| Fiber | 11.9 g | 6.4 g |
| Protein | 30.9 g | 27.9 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pipas Gigantes con Sal has 11% less fat (50.1 g vs 56.4 g).
- Pipas fritas peladas has 11% less sugar (3.1 g vs 3.5 g).
- Pipas fritas peladas has 87% less salt (1.4 g vs 11 g).
- Pipas Gigantes con Sal has 46% more fiber (11.9 g vs 6.4 g).
- Pipas fritas peladas has the better Nutri-Score.
- Pipas fritas peladas is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Pipas Gigantes con Sal
Pipas de girasol, sal, harina de arroz, espesante (goma guar).
Pipas fritas peladas
Pipas de girasol peladas, sal, aceite refinado de girasol, harina de arroz,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pipas Gigantes con Sal or Pipas fritas peladas?
Overall, Pipas fritas peladas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pipas Gigantes con Sal has fewer calories: 612 kcal versus 646 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pipas fritas peladas has less sugar: 3.1 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.