Comparison

Pipas vs Pipas Gigantes con Sal

Overall, Pipas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPipasPipas Gigantes con Sal
Nutri-Score b d
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 520 kcal 612 kcal
Fat 29 g 50.1 g
Saturated fat 3.4 g 5.2 g
Sugars 1.7 g 3.5 g
Salt 0.1 g 11 g
Fiber 2.7 g 11.9 g
Protein 24.6 g 30.9 g
Additives01
AllergensGlutenNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pipas has 15% fewer calories (520 kcal vs 612 kcal).
  • Pipas has 42% less fat (29 g vs 50.1 g).
  • Pipas has 35% less saturated fat (3.4 g vs 5.2 g).
  • Pipas has 53% less sugar (1.7 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Pipas has 99% less salt (0.1 g vs 11 g).
  • Pipas Gigantes con Sal has 77% more fiber (11.9 g vs 2.7 g).
  • Pipas Gigantes con Sal has 20% more protein (30.9 g vs 24.6 g).
  • Pipas has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Pipas is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Pipas lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Pipas

Sunflower seeds, wheat flour, salt

Pipas Gigantes con Sal

Pipas de girasol, sal, harina de arroz, espesante (goma guar).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pipas or Pipas Gigantes con Sal?

Overall, Pipas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pipas has fewer calories: 520 kcal versus 612 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pipas has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons