Pipas vs Pipas Gigantes con Sal
Overall, Pipas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pipas | Pipas Gigantes con Sal |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 520 kcal | 612 kcal |
| Fat | 29 g | 50.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.4 g | 5.2 g |
| Sugars | 1.7 g | 3.5 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 11 g |
| Fiber | 2.7 g | 11.9 g |
| Protein | 24.6 g | 30.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pipas has 15% fewer calories (520 kcal vs 612 kcal).
- Pipas has 42% less fat (29 g vs 50.1 g).
- Pipas has 35% less saturated fat (3.4 g vs 5.2 g).
- Pipas has 53% less sugar (1.7 g vs 3.5 g).
- Pipas has 99% less salt (0.1 g vs 11 g).
- Pipas Gigantes con Sal has 77% more fiber (11.9 g vs 2.7 g).
- Pipas Gigantes con Sal has 20% more protein (30.9 g vs 24.6 g).
- Pipas has the better Nutri-Score.
- Pipas is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Pipas lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Pipas
Sunflower seeds, wheat flour, salt
Pipas Gigantes con Sal
Pipas de girasol, sal, harina de arroz, espesante (goma guar).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pipas or Pipas Gigantes con Sal?
Overall, Pipas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pipas has fewer calories: 520 kcal versus 612 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pipas has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.