Comparison
Graines de tournesol grillés salées vs Pipas
Overall, Pipas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Graines de tournesol grillés... | Pipas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 585 kcal | 520 kcal |
| Fat | 51 g | 29 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.7 g | 3.4 g |
| Sugars | 2.8 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 6.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 3 g | 2.7 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 24.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pipas has 11% fewer calories (520 kcal vs 585 kcal).
- Pipas has 43% less fat (29 g vs 51 g).
- Pipas has 41% less saturated fat (3.4 g vs 5.7 g).
- Pipas has 41% less sugar (1.7 g vs 2.8 g).
- Pipas has 99% less salt (0.1 g vs 6.5 g).
- Pipas has 19% more protein (24.6 g vs 20 g).
- Pipas has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Pipas lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Graines de tournesol grillés salées
Graines de tournesol 94 %, sel 9 %, farine de riz
Pipas
Sunflower seeds, wheat flour, salt
FAQ
Which is healthier: Graines de tournesol grillés salées or Pipas?
Overall, Pipas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pipas has fewer calories: 520 kcal versus 585 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pipas has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 2.8 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Pipón tostado y salado vs Graines de tournesol gri...
Graines de tournesol gri... vs El piponazo formato ahor...
Graines de tournesol gri... vs El piponazo
Graines de tournesol gri... vs Pipas Gigantes con Sal
Pipas vs Pipas fritas peladas
Graines de tournesol gri... vs Pipas
Pipón tostado y salado vs Pipas
Pipas vs El piponazo formato ahor...