Comparison

Pipas vs Pipas fritas peladas

Overall, Pipas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPipasPipas fritas peladas
Nutri-Score b c
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 520 kcal 646 kcal
Fat 29 g 56.4 g
Saturated fat 3.4 g 5.4 g
Sugars 1.7 g 3.1 g
Salt 0.1 g 1.4 g
Fiber 2.7 g 6.4 g
Protein 24.6 g 27.9 g
Additives00
AllergensGlutenNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pipas has 20% fewer calories (520 kcal vs 646 kcal).
  • Pipas has 49% less fat (29 g vs 56.4 g).
  • Pipas has 38% less saturated fat (3.4 g vs 5.4 g).
  • Pipas has 47% less sugar (1.7 g vs 3.1 g).
  • Pipas has 96% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Pipas fritas peladas has 58% more fiber (6.4 g vs 2.7 g).
  • Pipas fritas peladas has 12% more protein (27.9 g vs 24.6 g).
  • Pipas has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Pipas lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Pipas

Sunflower seeds, wheat flour, salt

Pipas fritas peladas

Pipas de girasol peladas, sal, aceite refinado de girasol, harina de arroz,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pipas or Pipas fritas peladas?

Overall, Pipas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pipas has fewer calories: 520 kcal versus 646 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pipas has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons