Pipas vs Pipas fritas peladas
Overall, Pipas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pipas | Pipas fritas peladas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 520 kcal | 646 kcal |
| Fat | 29 g | 56.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.4 g | 5.4 g |
| Sugars | 1.7 g | 3.1 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 1.4 g |
| Fiber | 2.7 g | 6.4 g |
| Protein | 24.6 g | 27.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pipas has 20% fewer calories (520 kcal vs 646 kcal).
- Pipas has 49% less fat (29 g vs 56.4 g).
- Pipas has 38% less saturated fat (3.4 g vs 5.4 g).
- Pipas has 47% less sugar (1.7 g vs 3.1 g).
- Pipas has 96% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.4 g).
- Pipas fritas peladas has 58% more fiber (6.4 g vs 2.7 g).
- Pipas fritas peladas has 12% more protein (27.9 g vs 24.6 g).
- Pipas has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Pipas lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Pipas
Sunflower seeds, wheat flour, salt
Pipas fritas peladas
Pipas de girasol peladas, sal, aceite refinado de girasol, harina de arroz,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pipas or Pipas fritas peladas?
Overall, Pipas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pipas has fewer calories: 520 kcal versus 646 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pipas has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.