El piponazo formato ahorro vs Pipas fritas peladas
Overall, Pipas fritas peladas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | El piponazo formato ahorro | Pipas fritas peladas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 258 kcal | 646 kcal |
| Fat | 21 g | 56.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.8 g | 5.4 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 3.1 g |
| Salt | 10 g | 1.4 g |
| Fiber | 3.8 g | 6.4 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 27.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- El piponazo formato ahorro has 60% fewer calories (258 kcal vs 646 kcal).
- El piponazo formato ahorro has 63% less fat (21 g vs 56.4 g).
- El piponazo formato ahorro has 48% less saturated fat (2.8 g vs 5.4 g).
- El piponazo formato ahorro has 65% less sugar (1.1 g vs 3.1 g).
- Pipas fritas peladas has 86% less salt (1.4 g vs 10 g).
- Pipas fritas peladas has 41% more fiber (6.4 g vs 3.8 g).
- Pipas fritas peladas has 50% more protein (27.9 g vs 14 g).
- Pipas fritas peladas has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
El piponazo formato ahorro
Semillas de girasol, sal, harina de arroz, fécula de patata.
Pipas fritas peladas
Pipas de girasol peladas, sal, aceite refinado de girasol, harina de arroz,
FAQ
Which is healthier: El piponazo formato ahorro or Pipas fritas peladas?
Overall, Pipas fritas peladas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
El piponazo formato ahorro has fewer calories: 258 kcal versus 646 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
El piponazo formato ahorro has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.