Comparison

Perles de coco vs Perle de coco

Overall, Perle de coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPerles de cocoPerle de coco
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 266 kcal 239 kcal
Fat 7.2 g 4.4 g
Saturated fat 3.6 g 3.1 g
Sugars 14 g 19 g
Salt 0 g 0.1 g
Fiber 3.2 g —
Protein 3.6 g 3.2 g
Additives00
AllergensGluten, Milk, SoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Perle de coco has 10% fewer calories (239 kcal vs 266 kcal).
  • Perle de coco has 39% less fat (4.4 g vs 7.2 g).
  • Perle de coco has 14% less saturated fat (3.1 g vs 3.6 g).
  • Perles de coco has 26% less sugar (14 g vs 19 g).
  • Perles de coco has 11% more protein (3.6 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Only Perles de coco lists: Gluten, Milk, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Perles de coco

Graines de _soja_ cuites, amidon de _blé_, eau, sucre, amidon de riz, noix de coco râpée 3,3%, _lait_ de noix de coco en poudre 2,4% (contient _lait_), huile de tournesol, farine de _blé_, curcuma.

Perle de coco

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Perles de coco or Perle de coco?

Overall, Perle de coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Perle de coco has fewer calories: 239 kcal versus 266 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Perles de coco has less sugar: 14 g versus 19 g per 100 g.

More comparisons