Comparison

Perles de coco vs Perles de coco aux cacahuètes

Overall, Perles de coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPerles de cocoPerles de coco aux cacahuète...
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 266 kcal 320 kcal
Fat 7.2 g 15 g
Saturated fat 3.6 g 5 g
Sugars 14 g 15 g
Salt 0 g 0.6 g
Fiber 3.2 g —
Protein 3.6 g 3.5 g
Additives00
AllergensGluten, Milk, SoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Perles de coco has 17% fewer calories (266 kcal vs 320 kcal).
  • Perles de coco has 52% less fat (7.2 g vs 15 g).
  • Perles de coco has 28% less saturated fat (3.6 g vs 5 g).
  • Perles de coco has 93% less salt (0 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Perles de coco has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Perles de coco lists: Gluten, Milk, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Perles de coco

Graines de _soja_ cuites, amidon de _blé_, eau, sucre, amidon de riz, noix de coco râpée 3,3%, _lait_ de noix de coco en poudre 2,4% (contient _lait_), huile de tournesol, farine de _blé_, curcuma.

Perles de coco aux cacahuètes

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Perles de coco or Perles de coco aux cacahuètes?

Overall, Perles de coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Perles de coco has fewer calories: 266 kcal versus 320 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Perles de coco has less sugar: 14 g versus 15 g per 100 g.

More comparisons