Perles de coco vs Perles de coco aux cacahuètes
Overall, Perles de coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Perles de coco | Perles de coco aux cacahuète... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 250 kcal | 320 kcal |
| Fat | 7.5 g | 15 g |
| Saturated fat | 4 g | 5 g |
| Sugars | 16 g | 15 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.6 g |
| Protein | 5.2 g | 3.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Perles de coco has 22% fewer calories (250 kcal vs 320 kcal).
- Perles de coco has 50% less fat (7.5 g vs 15 g).
- Perles de coco has 20% less saturated fat (4 g vs 5 g).
- Perles de coco has 95% less salt (0 g vs 0.6 g).
- Perles de coco has 33% more protein (5.2 g vs 3.5 g).
- Perles de coco has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Perles de coco
Not available.
Perles de coco aux cacahuètes
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Perles de coco or Perles de coco aux cacahuètes?
Overall, Perles de coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Perles de coco has fewer calories: 250 kcal versus 320 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Perles de coco aux cacahuètes has less sugar: 15 g versus 16 g per 100 g.