Comparison
Pâte de soja salé vs Pâte Tikka Massala
Overall, Pâte de soja salé has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pâte de soja salé | Pâte Tikka Massala |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 138 kcal | 331 kcal |
| Fat | 3.1 g | 28.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 3.3 g |
| Sugars | 9.5 g | 7.2 g |
| Salt | 15.3 g | 5.4 g |
| Protein | 10.1 g | 3.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pâte de soja salé has 58% fewer calories (138 kcal vs 331 kcal).
- Pâte de soja salé has 89% less fat (3.1 g vs 28.2 g).
- Pâte de soja salé has 70% less saturated fat (1 g vs 3.3 g).
- Pâte Tikka Massala has 24% less sugar (7.2 g vs 9.5 g).
- Pâte Tikka Massala has 65% less salt (5.4 g vs 15.3 g).
- Pâte de soja salé has 63% more protein (10.1 g vs 3.7 g).
Ingredients
Pâte de soja salé
Not available.
Pâte Tikka Massala
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pâte de soja salé or Pâte Tikka Massala?
Overall, Pâte de soja salé has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pâte de soja salé has fewer calories: 138 kcal versus 331 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pâte Tikka Massala has less sugar: 7.2 g versus 9.5 g per 100 g.