Comparison

Gochujang vs Pâte Tikka Massala

Overall, Gochujang has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientGochujangPâte Tikka Massala
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 223 kcal 331 kcal
Fat 1.5 g 28.2 g
Saturated fat 0.3 g 3.3 g
Sugars 23 g 7.2 g
Salt 6.8 g 5.4 g
Protein 6 g 3.7 g
Additives00
AllergensGluten, Mustard, SoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Gochujang has 33% fewer calories (223 kcal vs 331 kcal).
  • Gochujang has 95% less fat (1.5 g vs 28.2 g).
  • Gochujang has 91% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 3.3 g).
  • Pâte Tikka Massala has 69% less sugar (7.2 g vs 23 g).
  • Pâte Tikka Massala has 21% less salt (5.4 g vs 6.8 g).
  • Gochujang has 38% more protein (6 g vs 3.7 g).
  • Only Gochujang lists: Gluten, Mustard, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Gochujang

WHEAT FLOUR, CORN SYRUP, SEASONING MIX (CHILLI POWDER 6,12%, WATER, SALT, GARLIC, ONION 0,31%), WATER, SALT, CHILLI POWDER 3,88%, ALCOHOL, HYDROLYSED WHEAT PROTEIN, GLUTEN. THIS PRODUCT MAY CONTAIN TRACES OF THE FOLLOWING ALLERGENS: BARLEY, SOYBEANS AND MUSTARD.

Pâte Tikka Massala

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Gochujang or Pâte Tikka Massala?

Overall, Gochujang has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Gochujang has fewer calories: 223 kcal versus 331 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pâte Tikka Massala has less sugar: 7.2 g versus 23 g per 100 g.

More comparisons