Garlic paste vs Pâte Tikka Massala
Overall, Garlic paste has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Garlic paste | Pâte Tikka Massala |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 313 kcal | 331 kcal |
| Fat | 27 g | 28.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 3 g | 3.3 g |
| Sugars | 12 g | 7.2 g |
| Salt | 2.6 g | 5.4 g |
| Fiber | 5.2 g | — |
| Protein | 1.8 g | 3.7 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pâte Tikka Massala has 40% less sugar (7.2 g vs 12 g).
- Garlic paste has 52% less salt (2.6 g vs 5.4 g).
- Pâte Tikka Massala has 51% more protein (3.7 g vs 1.8 g).
- Garlic paste has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Garlic paste
Vitlök (67%), solrosolja, salt, extra virgin olivolja, citronjuicekoncentrat, stabiliseringsmedel (xantangummi, guargummi).
Pâte Tikka Massala
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Garlic paste or Pâte Tikka Massala?
Overall, Garlic paste has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Garlic paste has fewer calories: 313 kcal versus 331 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pâte Tikka Massala has less sugar: 7.2 g versus 12 g per 100 g.