Comparison
Galanga vs Garlic paste
Overall, Galanga has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Galanga | Garlic paste |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 100 kcal | 313 kcal |
| Fat | 6.6 g | 27 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 12 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 2.6 g |
| Fiber | — | 5.2 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 1.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Galanga has 68% fewer calories (100 kcal vs 313 kcal).
- Galanga has 76% less fat (6.6 g vs 27 g).
- Galanga has no saturated fat, while Garlic paste has 3 g.
- Galanga has no sugar, while Garlic paste has 12 g.
- Galanga has 92% less salt (0.2 g vs 2.6 g).
- Garlic paste has 100% more protein (1.8 g vs 0 g).
- Galanga has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Galanga
Not available.
Garlic paste
Vitlök (67%), solrosolja, salt, extra virgin olivolja, citronjuicekoncentrat, stabiliseringsmedel (xantangummi, guargummi).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Galanga or Garlic paste?
Overall, Galanga has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Galanga has fewer calories: 100 kcal versus 313 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Galanga has less sugar: 0 g versus 12 g per 100 g.