Comparison
Galanga vs Pâte Tikka Massala
Overall, Galanga has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Galanga | Pâte Tikka Massala |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 100 kcal | 331 kcal |
| Fat | 6.6 g | 28.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 3.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 7.2 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 5.4 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Galanga has 70% fewer calories (100 kcal vs 331 kcal).
- Galanga has 77% less fat (6.6 g vs 28.2 g).
- Galanga has no saturated fat, while Pâte Tikka Massala has 3.3 g.
- Galanga has no sugar, while Pâte Tikka Massala has 7.2 g.
- Galanga has 96% less salt (0.2 g vs 5.4 g).
- Pâte Tikka Massala has 100% more protein (3.7 g vs 0 g).
- Galanga has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Galanga
Not available.
Pâte Tikka Massala
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Galanga or Pâte Tikka Massala?
Overall, Galanga has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Galanga has fewer calories: 100 kcal versus 331 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Galanga has less sugar: 0 g versus 7.2 g per 100 g.