Pate de porc integral vs Pate de rață integral
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pate de porc integral | Pate de rață integral |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 215 kcal | 278 kcal |
| Fat | 17 g | 24.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.9 g | 3.5 g |
| Sugars | 1.3 g | 1.3 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 10.8 g | 9.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Soybeans | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pate de porc integral has 23% fewer calories (215 kcal vs 278 kcal).
- Pate de porc integral has 31% less fat (17 g vs 24.5 g).
- Pate de rață integral has 41% less saturated fat (3.5 g vs 5.9 g).
- Pate de rață integral has no salt, while Pate de porc integral has 1.4 g.
- Pate de porc integral has 23% more fiber (1.3 g vs 1 g).
- Pate de porc integral has 15% more protein (10.8 g vs 9.2 g).
- Pate de rață integral has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Pate de porc integral
ficat de porc (24%), slănină, apă, șorici, proteină vegetală din _soia_, sare iodată, zahăr, amidon din porumb, ceapă, condimente, usturoi
Pate de rață integral
Ficat de rață (24%), ulei vegetal hidrogenat de floarea-soarelui, apă, carne de rață, proteină vegetală din _soia_, sare iodată, amidon din porumb, zahăr, ceapă, condimente, usturoi
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pate de porc integral or Pate de rață integral?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pate de porc integral has fewer calories: 215 kcal versus 278 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pate de porc integral has less sugar: 1.3 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.