Mousse de canard vs Pate de porc integral
Overall, Pate de porc integral has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mousse de canard | Pate de porc integral |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 395 kcal | 215 kcal |
| Fat | 39 g | 17 g |
| Saturated fat | 14 g | 5.9 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 1.3 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 1.4 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.3 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 10.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Milk | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pate de porc integral has 46% fewer calories (215 kcal vs 395 kcal).
- Pate de porc integral has 56% less fat (17 g vs 39 g).
- Pate de porc integral has 58% less saturated fat (5.9 g vs 14 g).
- Pate de porc integral has 19% less salt (1.4 g vs 1.7 g).
- Pate de porc integral has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Mousse de canard lists: Eggs, Milk.
- Only Pate de porc integral lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Mousse de canard
Canard 68% (foie maigre de canard, graisse de canard), lait, jaune d'oœuf crème, Porto, sel de mer, sucre, épices.
Pate de porc integral
ficat de porc (24%), slănină, apă, șorici, proteină vegetală din _soia_, sare iodată, zahăr, amidon din porumb, ceapă, condimente, usturoi
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mousse de canard or Pate de porc integral?
Overall, Pate de porc integral has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pate de porc integral has fewer calories: 215 kcal versus 395 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mousse de canard has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.