Comparison

Pate de porc integral vs Pate de porc

Overall, Pate de porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPate de porc integralPate de porc
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 215 kcal 186 kcal
Fat 17 g 13.9 g
Saturated fat 5.9 g 5 g
Sugars 1.3 g 1.2 g
Salt 1.4 g 1.2 g
Fiber 1.3 g 0.9 g
Protein 10.8 g 11 g
Additives07
AllergensSoybeansGluten, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pate de porc has 13% fewer calories (186 kcal vs 215 kcal).
  • Pate de porc has 18% less fat (13.9 g vs 17 g).
  • Pate de porc has 15% less saturated fat (5 g vs 5.9 g).
  • Pate de porc integral has 31% more fiber (1.3 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Pate de porc integral is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Pate de porc lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Pate de porc integral

ficat de porc (24%), slănină, apă, șorici, proteină vegetală din _soia_, sare iodată, zahăr, amidon din porumb, ceapă, condimente, usturoi

Pate de porc

pig liver (20%), bacon, water, mice, vegetable soy protein, iodized salt, corn starch, sugar, onions, white wheat flour, spices, dextrose, emulsifiers: monoglycerides and diglycerides of fatty acids, stabilizers: sodium diphosphates and triphosphates, yeast extract, thickening agent: xanthan gum, flavors, colouring: carmine, preservative: sodium nitrite:

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pate de porc integral or Pate de porc?

Overall, Pate de porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pate de porc has fewer calories: 186 kcal versus 215 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pate de porc has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons