Mousse de tourteau et de homard américain vs Pate de rață integral
Overall, Pate de rață integral has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Mousse de tourteau et de homard américain
Pate de rață integral
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mousse de tourteau et de hom... | Pate de rață integral |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 117 kcal | 278 kcal |
| Fat | 8 g | 24.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.4 g | 3.5 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 1.3 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 1 g |
| Protein | 8.4 g | 9.2 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | Crustaceans, Eggs, Milk, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mousse de tourteau et de homard américain has 58% fewer calories (117 kcal vs 278 kcal).
- Mousse de tourteau et de homard américain has 67% less fat (8 g vs 24.5 g).
- Pate de rață integral has 35% less sugar (1.3 g vs 2 g).
- Pate de rață integral has no salt, while Mousse de tourteau et de homard américain has 1.3 g.
- Pate de rață integral is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Mousse de tourteau et de homard américain lists: Crustaceans, Eggs, Milk, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
- Only Pate de rață integral lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Mousse de tourteau et de homard américain
25 % tourteau (crustacés), 12% sébaste (crustacés), jaune d'œuf, 8 % crème (lait), 6, , stabilisant: carraghénanes, 6,5 % concentré de tomate, 1,9 % protéines de lait , sel, 1%, sucre, 1% , 1% lait en poudre, jus de citron ( jus de citron, conservateur : disulfites de potassium), stabilisants : gomme guar, gomme xanthane,
Pate de rață integral
Ficat de rață (24%), ulei vegetal hidrogenat de floarea-soarelui, apă, carne de rață, proteină vegetală din _soia_, sare iodată, amidon din porumb, zahăr, ceapă, condimente, usturoi
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mousse de tourteau et de homard américain or Pate de rață integral?
Overall, Pate de rață integral has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mousse de tourteau et de homard américain has fewer calories: 117 kcal versus 278 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pate de rață integral has less sugar: 1.3 g versus 2 g per 100 g.