Comparison

Mousse de canard vs Pate de rață integral

Overall, Pate de rață integral has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMousse de canardPate de rață integral
Nutri-Score e c
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 395 kcal 278 kcal
Fat 39 g 24.5 g
Saturated fat 14 g 3.5 g
Sugars 1.1 g 1.3 g
Salt 1.7 g 0 g
Fiber — 1 g
Protein 10 g 9.2 g
Additives00
AllergensEggs, MilkSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pate de rață integral has 30% fewer calories (278 kcal vs 395 kcal).
  • Pate de rață integral has 37% less fat (24.5 g vs 39 g).
  • Pate de rață integral has 75% less saturated fat (3.5 g vs 14 g).
  • Pate de rață integral has no salt, while Mousse de canard has 1.7 g.
  • Pate de rață integral has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Mousse de canard lists: Eggs, Milk.
  • Only Pate de rață integral lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Mousse de canard

Canard 68% (foie maigre de canard, graisse de canard), lait, jaune d'oœuf crème, Porto, sel de mer, sucre, épices.

Pate de rață integral

Ficat de rață (24%), ulei vegetal hidrogenat de floarea-soarelui, apă, carne de rață, proteină vegetală din _soia_, sare iodată, amidon din porumb, zahăr, ceapă, condimente, usturoi

FAQ

Which is healthier: Mousse de canard or Pate de rață integral?

Overall, Pate de rață integral has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pate de rață integral has fewer calories: 278 kcal versus 395 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Mousse de canard has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons