Comparison

Pašteta Tuna vs Palitos de pescado

Overall, Pašteta Tuna has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPašteta TunaPalitos de pescado
Nutri-Score b c
NOVA group — 4
Calories 319 kcal 90 kcal
Fat 28 g 0.8 g
Saturated fat 3.2 g 0.2 g
Sugars 0.5 g 3.5 g
Salt 0 g 1.5 g
Fiber — 0.9 g
Protein 13 g 7.9 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedCrustaceans, Eggs, Fish, Molluscs, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Palitos de pescado has 72% fewer calories (90 kcal vs 319 kcal).
  • Palitos de pescado has 97% less fat (0.8 g vs 28 g).
  • Palitos de pescado has 94% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Pašteta Tuna has 85% less sugar (0.5 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Pašteta Tuna has no salt, while Palitos de pescado has 1.5 g.
  • Pašteta Tuna has 39% more protein (13 g vs 7.9 g).
  • Pašteta Tuna has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Palitos de pescado lists: Crustaceans, Eggs, Fish, Molluscs, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Pašteta Tuna

kuhano meso od TUNE 32%, voda, suncokretovo ulje, MLIJEČNE bjelančevine 3%, krumpirov škrob, luk, koncentrirani RIBLJI bujon, SOJINO brašno, kuhinjska sol, začini, ekstrakti začina i začinskog bilja (sadrži i ekstrakt CELERA), ekstrakt kvasca, ekstrakt paprike.

Palitos de pescado

surimi( merluza) pescado, agua,almidón, aromas( soja,pescado, moluscos, crustáceos,) sal, N (nabinal) clara de huevo, colorante (<extracto pimentón) sin gluten, sin lactosa

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pašteta Tuna or Palitos de pescado?

Overall, Pašteta Tuna has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Palitos de pescado has fewer calories: 90 kcal versus 319 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pašteta Tuna has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons