Comparison

Palitos de pescado vs Paté de atún original

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPalitos de pescadoPaté de atún original
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 90 kcal 243 kcal
Fat 0.8 g 19 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 3.1 g
Sugars 3.5 g 1 g
Salt 1.5 g 1.2 g
Fiber 0.9 g —
Protein 7.9 g 11 g
Additives00
AllergensCrustaceans, Eggs, Fish, Molluscs, SoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Palitos de pescado has 63% fewer calories (90 kcal vs 243 kcal).
  • Palitos de pescado has 96% less fat (0.8 g vs 19 g).
  • Palitos de pescado has 94% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 3.1 g).
  • Paté de atún original has 71% less sugar (1 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Paté de atún original has 22% less salt (1.2 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Paté de atún original has 28% more protein (11 g vs 7.9 g).
  • Only Palitos de pescado lists: Crustaceans, Eggs, Fish, Molluscs, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Palitos de pescado

surimi( merluza) pescado, agua,almidón, aromas( soja,pescado, moluscos, crustáceos,) sal, N (nabinal) clara de huevo, colorante (<extracto pimentón) sin gluten, sin lactosa

Paté de atún original

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Palitos de pescado or Paté de atún original?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Palitos de pescado has fewer calories: 90 kcal versus 243 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Paté de atún original has less sugar: 1 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons