Crème de sardine au whisky vs Paté de atún original
Overall, Paté de atún original has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Crème de sardine au whisky | Paté de atún original |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 398 kcal | 243 kcal |
| Fat | 37.9 g | 19 g |
| Saturated fat | 12.1 g | 3.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 10.9 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Paté de atún original has 39% fewer calories (243 kcal vs 398 kcal).
- Paté de atún original has 50% less fat (19 g vs 37.9 g).
- Paté de atún original has 74% less saturated fat (3.1 g vs 12.1 g).
- Crème de sardine au whisky has 40% less sugar (0.6 g vs 1 g).
- Crème de sardine au whisky has 50% less salt (0.6 g vs 1.2 g).
- Paté de atún original has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Crème de sardine au whisky lists: Fish, Milk.
Ingredients
Crème de sardine au whisky
Chair de _sardines_ (53%), huile d'olive vierge extra, beurre (_lait_), concentré de tomate, eau, whisky (2,3%), épices, extrait de citron
Paté de atún original
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Crème de sardine au whisky or Paté de atún original?
Overall, Paté de atún original has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Paté de atún original has fewer calories: 243 kcal versus 398 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Crème de sardine au whisky has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 1 g per 100 g.