Crème de sardine au whisky vs Pastel frio de atún
Overall, Pastel frio de atún has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Crème de sardine au whisky | Pastel frio de atún |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 398 kcal | 291 kcal |
| Fat | 37.9 g | 20.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 12.1 g | 2.9 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 10.9 g | 9.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pastel frio de atún has 27% fewer calories (291 kcal vs 398 kcal).
- Pastel frio de atún has 45% less fat (20.7 g vs 37.9 g).
- Pastel frio de atún has 76% less saturated fat (2.9 g vs 12.1 g).
- Crème de sardine au whisky has 65% less sugar (0.6 g vs 1.7 g).
- Crème de sardine au whisky has 42% less salt (0.6 g vs 1 g).
- Crème de sardine au whisky has 11% more protein (10.9 g vs 9.7 g).
- Pastel frio de atún has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Crème de sardine au whisky lists: Fish, Milk.
Ingredients
Crème de sardine au whisky
Chair de _sardines_ (53%), huile d'olive vierge extra, beurre (_lait_), concentré de tomate, eau, whisky (2,3%), épices, extrait de citron
Pastel frio de atún
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Crème de sardine au whisky or Pastel frio de atún?
Overall, Pastel frio de atún has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pastel frio de atún has fewer calories: 291 kcal versus 398 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Crème de sardine au whisky has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.