Comparison

Pašteta Tuna vs Paté atún

Overall, Pašteta Tuna has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPašteta TunaPaté atún
Nutri-Score b d
NOVA group — 4
Calories 319 kcal 205 kcal
Fat 28 g 15.1 g
Saturated fat 3.2 g 1.7 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0.7 g
Salt 0 g 2 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 13 g 9.8 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Paté atún has 36% fewer calories (205 kcal vs 319 kcal).
  • Paté atún has 46% less fat (15.1 g vs 28 g).
  • Paté atún has 47% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Pašteta Tuna has no salt, while Paté atún has 2 g.
  • Pašteta Tuna has 25% more protein (13 g vs 9.8 g).
  • Pašteta Tuna has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Paté atún lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Pašteta Tuna

kuhano meso od TUNE 32%, voda, suncokretovo ulje, MLIJEČNE bjelančevine 3%, krumpirov škrob, luk, koncentrirani RIBLJI bujon, SOJINO brašno, kuhinjska sol, začini, ekstrakti začina i začinskog bilja (sadrži i ekstrakt CELERA), ekstrakt kvasca, ekstrakt paprike.

Paté atún

Atún (50%), leche descremado, aceite de girasol, puré de patatas, sol, especias, aromas, estabilizonte (E-407), Contiene pescado, Sin colorantes ni conservadores

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pašteta Tuna or Paté atún?

Overall, Pašteta Tuna has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Paté atún has fewer calories: 205 kcal versus 319 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pašteta Tuna has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons