Comparison

Parmentier de Poisson vs Kippers

Overall, Parmentier de Poisson has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientParmentier de PoissonKippers
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 122 kcal 238 kcal
Fat 6.3 g 18 g
Saturated fat 3.9 g 3.6 g
Sugars 0.8 g 0 g
Salt 0.7 g 1.5 g
Fiber 1.2 g 0 g
Protein 7.6 g 19 g
Additives20
AllergensCelery, Fish, Gluten, MilkFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Parmentier de Poisson has 49% fewer calories (122 kcal vs 238 kcal).
  • Parmentier de Poisson has 65% less fat (6.3 g vs 18 g).
  • Kippers has no sugar, while Parmentier de Poisson has 0.8 g.
  • Parmentier de Poisson has 53% less salt (0.7 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Parmentier de Poisson has 100% more fiber (1.2 g vs 0 g).
  • Kippers has 60% more protein (19 g vs 7.6 g).
  • Parmentier de Poisson has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Kippers is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Parmentier de Poisson lists: Celery, Gluten, Milk.

Ingredients

Parmentier de Poisson

Flocons de pomme de terre réhydratés 47 % (eau, pommes de terre déshydratées, émulsifiant : E471), chair de cabillaud 16 %, colin d'Alaska 16 %, crème liquide 9 % (dont stabilisant : carraghénane), poudre de lait demi-écrémé, échalotes, beurre, emmental, huile d'olive, pulpe d'ail, sel, persil 0,19 %, poivre blanc. Traces de gluten.

Kippers

Smoked Kipper Herring Fillets (Fish), Sunflower Oil, Salt.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Parmentier de Poisson or Kippers?

Overall, Parmentier de Poisson has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Parmentier de Poisson has fewer calories: 122 kcal versus 238 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kippers has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons