Panna Cota vs Panna cotta
Overall, Panna cotta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Panna Cota | Panna cotta |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 175 kcal | 158 kcal |
| Fat | 12 g | 9 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.8 g | 6 g |
| Sugars | 12 g | 14.4 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 3.8 g | 3.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Panna cotta has 25% less fat (9 g vs 12 g).
- Panna cotta has 12% less saturated fat (6 g vs 6.8 g).
- Panna Cota has 17% less sugar (12 g vs 14.4 g).
Ingredients
Panna Cota
Not available.
Panna cotta
Glucose syrup, caramelized sugars. Can contain traces of milk PREPARATION POUR "PANNA COTTA" avec plein de Caramel Ingrédients: sucre, amidon de mais, gélatine alimentaire, gélifiant: carraghénanes, arômes. Ingrédients du Caramel: sirop de glucose, sucres caramélisés. Peut contenir des traces de lait 90g e complessivi Prodotto da/Produced by/Fabriqué par: Molino F.lli Chiavazza SPA Via Racconigi, 5-12030 Casalgrasso (CN) nello stabilimento di Via Pinerolo, 75 10060 Pancalieri (TO) Italia Tel. 011 975606 - Fax 011 975078 PRODUCT OF ITALY Da consumarsi preferibilmente entro il Best before: A consommer de préférence avant le:
FAQ
Which is healthier: Panna Cota or Panna cotta?
Overall, Panna cotta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Panna cotta has fewer calories: 158 kcal versus 175 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Panna Cota has less sugar: 12 g versus 14.4 g per 100 g.