Comparison

Pain au seigle precuit / 300g cuit vs Guldkorn

Overall, Pain au seigle precuit / 300g cuit has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPain au seigle precuit / 300...Guldkorn
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 242 kcal 267 kcal
Fat 0.9 g 2.4 g
Saturated fat 0.3 g 0.1 g
Sugars 2.3 g 9.6 g
Salt 1.2 g 1.1 g
Fiber 4.8 g 4.7 g
Protein 8.1 g 9.8 g
Additives21
AllergensGluten, Et produits à base de ces céréalesGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pain au seigle precuit / 300g cuit has 63% less fat (0.9 g vs 2.4 g).
  • Pain au seigle precuit / 300g cuit has 76% less sugar (2.3 g vs 9.6 g).
  • Guldkorn has 17% more protein (9.8 g vs 8.1 g).
  • Only Pain au seigle precuit / 300g cuit lists: Et produits à base de ces céréales.

Ingredients

Pain au seigle precuit / 300g cuit

Farine de blé (39%), eau, farine de seigle (17.5%), sel, levain de seigle désactivé et déshydraté, gluten de blé, levure, fibres de sarrasin, malt d'orge toasté, acidifiant : acide citrique, agent de traitement de la farine : acide ascorbique

Guldkorn

Vetemjöl, vatten, siktat rågmjöl, sirap, fullkornsvetemjöl, surdeg på fullkornsråg, och vete, klippt fullkornsråg, vetegluten, skållat vetemjöl, havremjöl, kornmjöl, rapsolja, vetegroddar, malt av korn och vete, jäst, salt, mjölbehandlingsmedel (askorbinsyra),

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pain au seigle precuit / 300g cuit or Guldkorn?

Overall, Pain au seigle precuit / 300g cuit has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pain au seigle precuit / 300g cuit has fewer calories: 242 kcal versus 267 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pain au seigle precuit / 300g cuit has less sugar: 2.3 g versus 9.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons