Comparison

Original Table Water vs Lightly Salted Crunchy Cracker Thins

Overall, Original Table Water has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientOriginal Table WaterLightly Salted Crunchy Crack...
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 417 kcal 411 kcal
Fat 7.7 g 10 g
Saturated fat 3.3 g 0.8 g
Sugars 1.5 g 9 g
Salt 1.5 g 2.4 g
Fiber 4.2 g 6.8 g
Protein 10.1 g 5.5 g
Additives00
AllergensGlutenNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Original Table Water has 23% less fat (7.7 g vs 10 g).
  • Lightly Salted Crunchy Cracker Thins has 76% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 3.3 g).
  • Original Table Water has 83% less sugar (1.5 g vs 9 g).
  • Original Table Water has 38% less salt (1.5 g vs 2.4 g).
  • Lightly Salted Crunchy Cracker Thins has 38% more fiber (6.8 g vs 4.2 g).
  • Original Table Water has 46% more protein (10.1 g vs 5.5 g).
  • Only Original Table Water lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Original Table Water

Flour (_Wheat Flour_, Calcium, Iron, Niacin, Thiamin), Vegetable Oil (Palm), Salt. May also contain _Sesame Seeds_.

Lightly Salted Crunchy Cracker Thins

Rice Flour, Cassava Flour, Sweet Potato Flour, Mixed Seeds (11%) (Chia (Salvia Hispanica), Quinoa, Poppy), Potato Flour, Brown Rice Syrup, Wholegrain Rice Flour, Rapeseed Oil, Sea Salt (3%), Olive Oil (1%), Black Pepper (1%), Paprika.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Original Table Water or Lightly Salted Crunchy Cracker Thins?

Overall, Original Table Water has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Lightly Salted Crunchy Cracker Thins has fewer calories: 411 kcal versus 417 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Original Table Water has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons