Organic Sun-Dried Dates Pitted Deglet Nour vs True Dates - Sour Cola
Overall, Organic Sun-Dried Dates Pitted Deglet Nour has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Organic Sun-Dried Dates Pitted Deglet Nour
True Dates - Sour Cola
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Organic Sun-Dried Dates Pitt... | True Dates - Sour Cola |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 275 kcal | 321 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 1.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 65 g | 67 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 7.5 g | 12 g |
| Protein | 2.5 g | 2.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Organic Sun-Dried Dates Pitted Deglet Nour has 14% fewer calories (275 kcal vs 321 kcal).
- Organic Sun-Dried Dates Pitted Deglet Nour has no fat, while True Dates - Sour Cola has 1.2 g.
- Organic Sun-Dried Dates Pitted Deglet Nour has no saturated fat, while True Dates - Sour Cola has 0.9 g.
- True Dates - Sour Cola has 38% more fiber (12 g vs 7.5 g).
- Organic Sun-Dried Dates Pitted Deglet Nour has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Organic Sun-Dried Dates Pitted Deglet Nour
ORGANIC PITTED DATES.
True Dates - Sour Cola
Dates (non-EU) 97%, fibre from chicory root, malic acid, vegetable fat (shea, coconut), natural falavouring.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Organic Sun-Dried Dates Pitted Deglet Nour or True Dates - Sour Cola?
Overall, Organic Sun-Dried Dates Pitted Deglet Nour has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Organic Sun-Dried Dates Pitted Deglet Nour has fewer calories: 275 kcal versus 321 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Organic Sun-Dried Dates Pitted Deglet Nour has less sugar: 65 g versus 67 g per 100 g.