Organic Stone Ground Whole Wheat Flour vs Reduced Fat Milk
Overall, Organic Stone Ground Whole Wheat Flour has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Organic Stone Ground Whole Wheat Flour
Reduced Fat Milk
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Organic Stone Ground Whole W... | Reduced Fat Milk |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | b |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 368 kcal | 54 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 2.1 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 1.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 4.6 g |
| Salt | — | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 18.4 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 15.8 g | 3.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Reduced Fat Milk has 85% fewer calories (54 kcal vs 368 kcal).
- Organic Stone Ground Whole Wheat Flour has no fat, while Reduced Fat Milk has 2.1 g.
- Organic Stone Ground Whole Wheat Flour has no sugar, while Reduced Fat Milk has 4.6 g.
- Organic Stone Ground Whole Wheat Flour has 100% more fiber (18.4 g vs 0 g).
- Organic Stone Ground Whole Wheat Flour has 79% more protein (15.8 g vs 3.3 g).
- Only Organic Stone Ground Whole Wheat Flour lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Organic Stone Ground Whole Wheat Flour
Organic Whole Grain Hard Red Wheat. CONTAINS: Wheat.
Reduced Fat Milk
Organic grade a reduced fat milk, vitamin a palmitate, vitamin d3.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Organic Stone Ground Whole Wheat Flour or Reduced Fat Milk?
Overall, Organic Stone Ground Whole Wheat Flour has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Reduced Fat Milk has fewer calories: 54 kcal versus 368 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Organic Stone Ground Whole Wheat Flour has less sugar: 0 g versus 4.6 g per 100 g.