Comparison

Organic Stone Ground Whole Wheat Flour vs Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientOrganic Stone Ground Whole W...Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel
Nutri-Score — a
NOVA group — 1
Calories 368 kcal 137 kcal
Fat 0 g 6.3 g
Saturated fat — 1.8 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt — 0.2 g
Fiber 18.4 g 0 g
Protein 15.8 g 20 g
Additives00
AllergensGlutenChicken

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel has 63% fewer calories (137 kcal vs 368 kcal).
  • Organic Stone Ground Whole Wheat Flour has no fat, while Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel has 6.3 g.
  • Organic Stone Ground Whole Wheat Flour has 100% more fiber (18.4 g vs 0 g).
  • Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel has 21% more protein (20 g vs 15.8 g).
  • Only Organic Stone Ground Whole Wheat Flour lists: Gluten.
  • Only Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel lists: Chicken.

Ingredients

Organic Stone Ground Whole Wheat Flour

Organic Whole Grain Hard Red Wheat. CONTAINS: Wheat.

Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel

Chicken

FAQ

Which is healthier: Organic Stone Ground Whole Wheat Flour or Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel has fewer calories: 137 kcal versus 368 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Organic Stone Ground Whole Wheat Flour has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons