Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel vs Kefir
Overall, Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel | Kefir |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 137 kcal | 64 kcal |
| Fat | 6.3 g | 2.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.8 g | 1.4 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 5.4 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 20 g | 4.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Chicken | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kefir has 53% fewer calories (64 kcal vs 137 kcal).
- Kefir has 67% less fat (2.1 g vs 6.3 g).
- Kefir has 22% less saturated fat (1.4 g vs 1.8 g).
- Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel has no sugar, while Kefir has 5.4 g.
- Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel has 77% more protein (20 g vs 4.7 g).
- Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel lists: Chicken.
- Only Kefir lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel
Chicken
Kefir
Organic milk, live kefir cultures
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel or Kefir?
Overall, Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kefir has fewer calories: 64 kcal versus 137 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel has less sugar: 0 g versus 5.4 g per 100 g.