Comparison

Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel vs Kefir

Overall, Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBio Kipdijlapjes zonder velKefir
Nutri-Score a c
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 137 kcal 64 kcal
Fat 6.3 g 2.1 g
Saturated fat 1.8 g 1.4 g
Sugars 0 g 5.4 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 20 g 4.7 g
Additives00
AllergensChickenMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kefir has 53% fewer calories (64 kcal vs 137 kcal).
  • Kefir has 67% less fat (2.1 g vs 6.3 g).
  • Kefir has 22% less saturated fat (1.4 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel has no sugar, while Kefir has 5.4 g.
  • Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel has 77% more protein (20 g vs 4.7 g).
  • Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel lists: Chicken.
  • Only Kefir lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel

Chicken

Kefir

Organic milk, live kefir cultures

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel or Kefir?

Overall, Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kefir has fewer calories: 64 kcal versus 137 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel has less sugar: 0 g versus 5.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons