Comparison

Whole peeled tomatoes vs Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel

Overall, Whole peeled tomatoes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientWhole peeled tomatoesBio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 3 1
Calories 20 kcal 137 kcal
Fat 0 g 6.3 g
Saturated fat 0 g 1.8 g
Sugars 2.5 g 0 g
Salt 0.4 g 0.2 g
Fiber 0.8 g 0 g
Protein 0.8 g 20 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedChicken

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Whole peeled tomatoes has 85% fewer calories (20 kcal vs 137 kcal).
  • Whole peeled tomatoes has no fat, while Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel has 6.3 g.
  • Whole peeled tomatoes has no saturated fat, while Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel has 1.8 g.
  • Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel has no sugar, while Whole peeled tomatoes has 2.5 g.
  • Whole peeled tomatoes has 100% more fiber (0.8 g vs 0 g).
  • Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel has 96% more protein (20 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel lists: Chicken.

Ingredients

Whole peeled tomatoes

Whole tomatoes*, tomato juice*, sea salt, naturally derived citric acid and calcium chloride.

Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel

Chicken

FAQ

Which is healthier: Whole peeled tomatoes or Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel?

Overall, Whole peeled tomatoes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Whole peeled tomatoes has fewer calories: 20 kcal versus 137 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Bio Kipdijlapjes zonder vel has less sugar: 0 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons