Comparison

Olives noires kalamata vs Stoneless olives

Overall, Stoneless olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientOlives noires kalamataStoneless olives
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 3 1
Calories 254 kcal 125 kcal
Fat 27 g 13 g
Saturated fat 3.5 g 2.2 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 4 g 2 g
Fiber 3.5 g —
Protein 2 g 0.5 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Stoneless olives has 51% fewer calories (125 kcal vs 254 kcal).
  • Stoneless olives has 52% less fat (13 g vs 27 g).
  • Stoneless olives has 37% less saturated fat (2.2 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Stoneless olives has 50% less salt (2 g vs 4 g).
  • Olives noires kalamata has 75% more protein (2 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Stoneless olives has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Stoneless olives is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Olives noires kalamata

olives (Grèce), eau, sel de cuisine, jus de citron. Tous les ingrédients agricoles sont issus de la production biologique

Stoneless olives

Black Olives (50%), Water, Sea Salt Stabiliser (Ferrous Gluconate). May contain stones

FAQ

Which is healthier: Olives noires kalamata or Stoneless olives?

Overall, Stoneless olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Stoneless olives has fewer calories: 125 kcal versus 254 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Olives noires kalamata has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons