Comparison

Olives Kalamata entières bio vs Stoneless olives

Overall, Stoneless olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientOlives Kalamata entières bioStoneless olives
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 3 1
Calories 187 kcal 125 kcal
Fat 20 g 13 g
Saturated fat 2.8 g 2.2 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0 g
Salt 3 g 2 g
Fiber 4.4 g —
Protein 0.8 g 0.5 g
Additives01
AllergensNoneNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Stoneless olives has 33% fewer calories (125 kcal vs 187 kcal).
  • Stoneless olives has 35% less fat (13 g vs 20 g).
  • Stoneless olives has 21% less saturated fat (2.2 g vs 2.8 g).
  • Stoneless olives has no sugar, while Olives Kalamata entières bio has 0.5 g.
  • Stoneless olives has 33% less salt (2 g vs 3 g).
  • Olives Kalamata entières bio has 38% more protein (0.8 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Stoneless olives is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Olives Kalamata entières bio lists: None.

Ingredients

Olives Kalamata entières bio

Olives Kalamata au naturel entières*, eau, sel de mer, jus de citron en poudre*. *Produits issus de l'Agriculture Biologique.

Stoneless olives

Black Olives (50%), Water, Sea Salt Stabiliser (Ferrous Gluconate). May contain stones

FAQ

Which is healthier: Olives Kalamata entières bio or Stoneless olives?

Overall, Stoneless olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Stoneless olives has fewer calories: 125 kcal versus 187 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Stoneless olives has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons