Olives Kalamata entières bio vs Garlic facaccine
Overall, Garlic facaccine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Olives Kalamata entières bio | Garlic facaccine |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 187 kcal | 286 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 10.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.8 g | 1.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 3.3 g |
| Salt | 3 g | 1.3 g |
| Fiber | 4.4 g | 3.5 g |
| Protein | 0.8 g | 1.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Olives Kalamata entières bio has 35% fewer calories (187 kcal vs 286 kcal).
- Garlic facaccine has 50% less fat (10.1 g vs 20 g).
- Garlic facaccine has 54% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 2.8 g).
- Olives Kalamata entières bio has 85% less sugar (0.5 g vs 3.3 g).
- Garlic facaccine has 57% less salt (1.3 g vs 3 g).
- Olives Kalamata entières bio has 20% more fiber (4.4 g vs 3.5 g).
- Garlic facaccine has 27% more protein (1.1 g vs 0.8 g).
- Garlic facaccine has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Olives Kalamata entières bio lists: None.
Ingredients
Olives Kalamata entières bio
Olives Kalamata au naturel entières*, eau, sel de mer, jus de citron en poudre*. *Produits issus de l'Agriculture Biologique.
Garlic facaccine
Water, Pitted Black Olives, Salt, Stabiliser: Ferrous Gluconate.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Olives Kalamata entières bio or Garlic facaccine?
Overall, Garlic facaccine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Olives Kalamata entières bio has fewer calories: 187 kcal versus 286 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Olives Kalamata entières bio has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 3.3 g per 100 g.