Olives a la grecque vs Kalamata olives
Overall, Kalamata olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Olives a la grecque | Kalamata olives |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 359 kcal | 192 kcal |
| Fat | 38 g | 19.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.9 g | 2.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 8 g | 2.8 g |
| Fiber | 6.6 g | 2.6 g |
| Protein | 2.1 g | 1.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kalamata olives has 47% fewer calories (192 kcal vs 359 kcal).
- Kalamata olives has 48% less fat (19.7 g vs 38 g).
- Kalamata olives has 55% less saturated fat (2.2 g vs 4.9 g).
- Kalamata olives has 65% less salt (2.8 g vs 8 g).
- Olives a la grecque has 61% more fiber (6.6 g vs 2.6 g).
- Olives a la grecque has 29% more protein (2.1 g vs 1.5 g).
- Kalamata olives has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Kalamata olives lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Olives a la grecque
Olives noires, sel, huile d'olive vierge (0,8%)
Kalamata olives
Kalamata Olives, Water, Salt, RED WINE VINEGAR (29%), Lactic Acid.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Olives a la grecque or Kalamata olives?
Overall, Kalamata olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kalamata olives has fewer calories: 192 kcal versus 359 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Olives a la grecque has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.