Comparison

Olives a la grecque vs Kalamata olives

Overall, Kalamata olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientOlives a la grecqueKalamata olives
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 359 kcal 192 kcal
Fat 38 g 19.7 g
Saturated fat 4.9 g 2.2 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 8 g 2.8 g
Fiber 6.6 g 2.6 g
Protein 2.1 g 1.5 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedNuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kalamata olives has 47% fewer calories (192 kcal vs 359 kcal).
  • Kalamata olives has 48% less fat (19.7 g vs 38 g).
  • Kalamata olives has 55% less saturated fat (2.2 g vs 4.9 g).
  • Kalamata olives has 65% less salt (2.8 g vs 8 g).
  • Olives a la grecque has 61% more fiber (6.6 g vs 2.6 g).
  • Olives a la grecque has 29% more protein (2.1 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Kalamata olives has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Kalamata olives lists: Nuts.

Ingredients

Olives a la grecque

Olives noires, sel, huile d'olive vierge (0,8%)

Kalamata olives

Kalamata Olives, Water, Salt, RED WINE VINEGAR (29%), Lactic Acid.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Olives a la grecque or Kalamata olives?

Overall, Kalamata olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kalamata olives has fewer calories: 192 kcal versus 359 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Olives a la grecque has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons