Kalamata olive paste vs Kalamata olives
Overall, Kalamata olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kalamata olive paste | Kalamata olives |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 250 kcal | 192 kcal |
| Fat | 25 g | 19.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.6 g | 2.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 21.5 g | 2.8 g |
| Fiber | 6.8 g | 2.6 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 1.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kalamata olives has 23% fewer calories (192 kcal vs 250 kcal).
- Kalamata olives has 21% less fat (19.7 g vs 25 g).
- Kalamata olives has 16% less saturated fat (2.2 g vs 2.6 g).
- Kalamata olives has 87% less salt (2.8 g vs 21.5 g).
- Kalamata olive paste has 62% more fiber (6.8 g vs 2.6 g).
- Kalamata olives has 100% more protein (1.5 g vs 0 g).
- Only Kalamata olives lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Kalamata olive paste
96% oliwki Kalamon (oliwki, woda, sól), oliwa z oliwek, czerwona papryka, ocet winny, oregano, regulator kwasowości: kwas mlekowy,
Kalamata olives
Kalamata Olives, Water, Salt, RED WINE VINEGAR (29%), Lactic Acid.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kalamata olive paste or Kalamata olives?
Overall, Kalamata olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kalamata olives has fewer calories: 192 kcal versus 250 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kalamata olives has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.