Kalamata olive paste vs Big Kalamata Pitted Olives
Overall, Kalamata olive paste has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kalamata olive paste | Big Kalamata Pitted Olives |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 250 kcal | 273 kcal |
| Fat | 25 g | 29 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.6 g | 3.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 21.5 g | 3.5 g |
| Fiber | 6.8 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 2.1 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kalamata olive paste has 14% less fat (25 g vs 29 g).
- Kalamata olive paste has 25% less saturated fat (2.6 g vs 3.5 g).
- Kalamata olive paste has 90% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Big Kalamata Pitted Olives has 84% less salt (3.5 g vs 21.5 g).
- Big Kalamata Pitted Olives has 100% more protein (2.1 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Kalamata olive paste
96% oliwki Kalamon (oliwki, woda, sól), oliwa z oliwek, czerwona papryka, ocet winny, oregano, regulator kwasowości: kwas mlekowy,
Big Kalamata Pitted Olives
Kalamata Olives, Water, Sea Salt, Red Wine Vinegar, Extra Virgin Olive Oil (2%), Acidity Regulator (lactic acid).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kalamata olive paste or Big Kalamata Pitted Olives?
Overall, Kalamata olive paste has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kalamata olive paste has fewer calories: 250 kcal versus 273 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kalamata olive paste has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.