Olives a la grecque vs Kalamata olive paste
Overall, Kalamata olive paste has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Olives a la grecque | Kalamata olive paste |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 359 kcal | 250 kcal |
| Fat | 38 g | 25 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.9 g | 2.6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 8 g | 21.5 g |
| Fiber | 6.6 g | 6.8 g |
| Protein | 2.1 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kalamata olive paste has 30% fewer calories (250 kcal vs 359 kcal).
- Kalamata olive paste has 34% less fat (25 g vs 38 g).
- Kalamata olive paste has 47% less saturated fat (2.6 g vs 4.9 g).
- Olives a la grecque has 63% less salt (8 g vs 21.5 g).
- Olives a la grecque has 100% more protein (2.1 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Olives a la grecque
Olives noires, sel, huile d'olive vierge (0,8%)
Kalamata olive paste
96% oliwki Kalamon (oliwki, woda, sól), oliwa z oliwek, czerwona papryka, ocet winny, oregano, regulator kwasowości: kwas mlekowy,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Olives a la grecque or Kalamata olive paste?
Overall, Kalamata olive paste has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kalamata olive paste has fewer calories: 250 kcal versus 359 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Olives a la grecque has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.