Olives a la grecque vs Big Kalamata Pitted Olives
Overall, Big Kalamata Pitted Olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Olives a la grecque | Big Kalamata Pitted Olives |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 359 kcal | 273 kcal |
| Fat | 38 g | 29 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.9 g | 3.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 8 g | 3.5 g |
| Fiber | 6.6 g | — |
| Protein | 2.1 g | 2.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Big Kalamata Pitted Olives has 24% fewer calories (273 kcal vs 359 kcal).
- Big Kalamata Pitted Olives has 24% less fat (29 g vs 38 g).
- Big Kalamata Pitted Olives has 29% less saturated fat (3.5 g vs 4.9 g).
- Olives a la grecque has no sugar, while Big Kalamata Pitted Olives has 0.5 g.
- Big Kalamata Pitted Olives has 56% less salt (3.5 g vs 8 g).
Ingredients
Olives a la grecque
Olives noires, sel, huile d'olive vierge (0,8%)
Big Kalamata Pitted Olives
Kalamata Olives, Water, Sea Salt, Red Wine Vinegar, Extra Virgin Olive Oil (2%), Acidity Regulator (lactic acid).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Olives a la grecque or Big Kalamata Pitted Olives?
Overall, Big Kalamata Pitted Olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Big Kalamata Pitted Olives has fewer calories: 273 kcal versus 359 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Olives a la grecque has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.