Comparison

Kalamata olives vs Big Kalamata Pitted Olives

Overall, Kalamata olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKalamata olivesBig Kalamata Pitted Olives
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 192 kcal 273 kcal
Fat 19.7 g 29 g
Saturated fat 2.2 g 3.5 g
Sugars 0 g 0.5 g
Salt 2.8 g 3.5 g
Fiber 2.6 g —
Protein 1.5 g 2.1 g
Additives11
AllergensNutsNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kalamata olives has 30% fewer calories (192 kcal vs 273 kcal).
  • Kalamata olives has 32% less fat (19.7 g vs 29 g).
  • Kalamata olives has 37% less saturated fat (2.2 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Kalamata olives has no sugar, while Big Kalamata Pitted Olives has 0.5 g.
  • Kalamata olives has 19% less salt (2.8 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Big Kalamata Pitted Olives has 29% more protein (2.1 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Kalamata olives has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Kalamata olives lists: Nuts.

Ingredients

Kalamata olives

Kalamata Olives, Water, Salt, RED WINE VINEGAR (29%), Lactic Acid.

Big Kalamata Pitted Olives

Kalamata Olives, Water, Sea Salt, Red Wine Vinegar, Extra Virgin Olive Oil (2%), Acidity Regulator (lactic acid).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Kalamata olives or Big Kalamata Pitted Olives?

Overall, Kalamata olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kalamata olives has fewer calories: 192 kcal versus 273 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kalamata olives has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons