Moroccan lentils vs Lentilhas cozidas
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Moroccan lentils | Lentilhas cozidas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 100 kcal | 128 kcal |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 2.7 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 7.1 g | 5.1 g |
| Protein | 7.3 g | 8.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | Lupin |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Moroccan lentils has 22% fewer calories (100 kcal vs 128 kcal).
- Lentilhas cozidas has 38% less fat (0.8 g vs 1.3 g).
- Lentilhas cozidas has no sugar, while Moroccan lentils has 2.7 g.
- Moroccan lentils has 96% less salt (0 g vs 0.8 g).
- Moroccan lentils has 28% more fiber (7.1 g vs 5.1 g).
- Lentilhas cozidas has 11% more protein (8.2 g vs 7.3 g).
- Only Moroccan lentils lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
- Only Lentilhas cozidas lists: Lupin.
Ingredients
Moroccan lentils
Water, Soaked Brown Lentils (Lentils, Water) (51%) Onion, Tomato Paste, Dried Apricots (Apricot, Rice Flour) (contains Sulphites) Red Bell Pepper, Sugar, Garlic Salt, Vegetable Oil (Rapeseed), Green Chilli Ground Spices (Paprika Cumin Ginger Turmeric Coriander).
Lentilhas cozidas
Lentilhas, água, sal, antioxidantes (ácido ascórbico e EDTA de cálcio dissódico) e regulador de acidez (ácido cítico). Pode conter vestigios de sulfitos. tremoço e soja
FAQ
Which is healthier: Moroccan lentils or Lentilhas cozidas?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Moroccan lentils has fewer calories: 100 kcal versus 128 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lentilhas cozidas has less sugar: 0 g versus 2.7 g per 100 g.