Comparison

Mix de graines complète vs Biologisch Gember Concentraat

Overall, Mix de graines complète has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMix de graines complèteBiologisch Gember Concentraa...
Nutri-Score a c
NOVA group 1 3
Calories 565 kcal 141 kcal
Fat 41 g 0.2 g
Saturated fat 5.1 g 0.2 g
Sugars 2.9 g 33 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 7.4 g —
Protein 22 g 0.4 g
Additives00
AllergensGluten, Mustard, Sesame seedsNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Biologisch Gember Concentraat has 75% fewer calories (141 kcal vs 565 kcal).
  • Biologisch Gember Concentraat has 100% less fat (0.2 g vs 41 g).
  • Biologisch Gember Concentraat has 96% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 5.1 g).
  • Mix de graines complète has 91% less sugar (2.9 g vs 33 g).
  • Mix de graines complète has 98% more protein (22 g vs 0.4 g).
  • Mix de graines complète has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Mix de graines complète is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Mix de graines complète lists: Gluten, Mustard, Sesame seeds.

Ingredients

Mix de graines complète

Graines de tournesol* (40%), kasha* (sarrasin* grillé) (22%), graines de courge* (16%), SÉSAME blond* toasté (11%), SÉSAME noir* toasté (11%). *Produit issu de l'agriculture biologique.

Biologisch Gember Concentraat

Gingembre, sucre de canne, citron, eau, épices > origine bio

FAQ

Which is healthier: Mix de graines complète or Biologisch Gember Concentraat?

Overall, Mix de graines complète has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Biologisch Gember Concentraat has fewer calories: 141 kcal versus 565 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Mix de graines complète has less sugar: 2.9 g versus 33 g per 100 g.

More comparisons