Comparison

Melba Toast Sesame vs Crackers Houmous Betterave

Overall, Melba Toast Sesame has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMelba Toast SesameCrackers Houmous Betterave
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group — 3
Calories 405 kcal 477 kcal
Fat 6.9 g 20 g
Saturated fat 1.6 g 5.7 g
Sugars 3.2 g 3.7 g
Salt 2.1 g 1.2 g
Fiber 5 g 10 g
Protein 13.3 g 15 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Melba Toast Sesame has 15% fewer calories (405 kcal vs 477 kcal).
  • Melba Toast Sesame has 66% less fat (6.9 g vs 20 g).
  • Melba Toast Sesame has 72% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 5.7 g).
  • Melba Toast Sesame has 14% less sugar (3.2 g vs 3.7 g).
  • Crackers Houmous Betterave has 43% less salt (1.2 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Crackers Houmous Betterave has 50% more fiber (10 g vs 5 g).
  • Crackers Houmous Betterave has 11% more protein (15 g vs 13.3 g).
  • Only Crackers Houmous Betterave lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Melba Toast Sesame

o artificial colors, flavors or preservatives MELBA TOAST Sesame 10 Stay Fresh Packs Net Wt: 70z (200ge Poids Net/ Netto Gewicht Kosher Parve

Crackers Houmous Betterave

Farine de maïs locale HVE, farine de riz, haricots blancs de Vendée, betterave cuite locale (30%), beurre AOP Charentes Poitou, ail en poudre, sel de l'ile de Ré, poivre. Peut contenir des traces de fruits à coques et moutarde

FAQ

Which is healthier: Melba Toast Sesame or Crackers Houmous Betterave?

Overall, Melba Toast Sesame has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Melba Toast Sesame has fewer calories: 405 kcal versus 477 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Melba Toast Sesame has less sugar: 3.2 g versus 3.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons