Crackers Houmous Betterave vs Crackers Pocket
Overall, Crackers Houmous Betterave has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Crackers Houmous Betterave | Crackers Pocket |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 477 kcal | 476 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 21 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.7 g | 8.5 g |
| Sugars | 3.7 g | 3 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 10 g | 3.5 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Crackers Houmous Betterave has 33% less saturated fat (5.7 g vs 8.5 g).
- Crackers Pocket has 19% less sugar (3 g vs 3.7 g).
- Crackers Houmous Betterave has 20% less salt (1.2 g vs 1.5 g).
- Crackers Houmous Betterave has 65% more fiber (10 g vs 3.5 g).
- Crackers Houmous Betterave has 33% more protein (15 g vs 10 g).
- Crackers Houmous Betterave has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Crackers Houmous Betterave lists: Milk.
- Only Crackers Pocket lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Crackers Houmous Betterave
Farine de maïs locale HVE, farine de riz, haricots blancs de Vendée, betterave cuite locale (30%), beurre AOP Charentes Poitou, ail en poudre, sel de l'ile de Ré, poivre. Peut contenir des traces de fruits à coques et moutarde
Crackers Pocket
maize starch, soya flour, palm oil, rice flour, potato starch, sugar, salt, yeast, may also contain sesame,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Crackers Houmous Betterave or Crackers Pocket?
Overall, Crackers Houmous Betterave has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Crackers Pocket has fewer calories: 476 kcal versus 477 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Crackers Pocket has less sugar: 3 g versus 3.7 g per 100 g.