Matzen vs Original Paratha
Overall, Matzen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Matzen | Original Paratha |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 362 kcal | 343 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 9.1 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 3.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 3.3 g | 3.8 g |
| Protein | 11.3 g | 6.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Matzen has 94% less fat (1 g vs 18 g).
- Matzen has 98% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 9.1 g).
- Matzen has 68% less sugar (1.2 g vs 3.8 g).
- Matzen has no salt, while Original Paratha has 0.8 g.
- Original Paratha has 12% more fiber (3.8 g vs 3.3 g).
- Matzen has 46% more protein (11.3 g vs 6.1 g).
- Matzen has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Original Paratha lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Matzen
Farina di frumento, acqua
Original Paratha
Wheat Flour, Water, Margarine (Soy - Palm Oil Based), Sugar, Salt, Baking Powder. INGRÉDIENTS: Farine de Blé, Eau, Margarine
FAQ
Which is healthier: Matzen or Original Paratha?
Overall, Matzen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Original Paratha has fewer calories: 343 kcal versus 362 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Matzen has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 3.8 g per 100 g.