Matzen vs Matzen
Overall, Matzen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Matzen | Matzen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 378 kcal | 362 kcal |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 1.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.7 g | 3.3 g |
| Protein | 11.8 g | 11.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Sesame seeds | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Matzen has 23% less fat (1 g vs 1.3 g).
- Matzen has 11% more fiber (3.7 g vs 3.3 g).
- Matzen is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Matzen lists: Sesame seeds.
Ingredients
Matzen
Dinkelmehl (98%), Buchweizenmehl, Wasser. *aus kontrolliert biologischer Landwirt - schaft Kann Spuren von Sesamsamen, Soja und Senfentha lten. Kühl und trocken lagern.
Matzen
Farina di frumento, acqua
FAQ
Which is healthier: Matzen or Matzen?
Overall, Matzen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Matzen has fewer calories: 362 kcal versus 378 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Matzen has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.